In o’connor v. consolidated coin caterers corp., the court of appeal held that: a. none of the above. b. the adea did not require the employer to demonstrate any intention to discriminate. c.

In o’connor v. consolidated coin caterers corp., the court of appeal held that:​

a. ​none of the above.

b. ​the adea did not require the employer to demonstrate any intention to discriminate.

c. ​whether the replacement was over or under 40 years of age was irrelevant.

d. ​the adea does not provide for disparate impact cases against older officers.