What is the difference between judicial, deliberative, and epideictic rhetoric?

The judicial rhetoric must denounce or safeguard, his discourse was tending to a judge in the past and its end is the fair or the unreasonable. Judicial rhetoric manages allegation and resistance and requires the rhetoric to consider the wellsprings of wrongdoing the conative condition of the wrongdoer and the objects of his wrongdoing. Wrongdoing is the deliberate cause of damage in opposition to the law.
What is the difference between judicial, deliberative, and epideictic rhetoric?