Assessment ：Case study 
Founded in 1890, the University of Tasmania is the fourth oldest university in Australia. It has over 29,000 local, national and international students, four campuses, and is a major employer in Tasmania. If you look at their website http://www.utas.edu.au/ you will see this description: 
The University of Tasmania (UTAS) is an institution of global standing and impact. Ranked in the top 2% of the world’s universities and in the top ten Australian research universities, UTAS has a growing reputation as one of Australia’s premier learning and research institutions. UTAS’ success as a global university is underpinned by collaborative partnerships with individuals, universities and other organizations who share our strategic outlook. These partnerships are founded on the co-creation of opportunities for both teaching and research collaboration and bring together people who share our passion for high-impact outcomes.
Your task
You are a sustainability consultant and UTAS has commissioned your services to examine their organization in terms of sustainability. You will present your findings in a Report. To do this, you will need to complete the following tasks:
Gather evidence of UTAS’ current practices. Relevant information can be found on the UTAS website, but you will no doubt need more information than is provided by the organization. Make sure you reference from where you are sourcing your information.
Apply your Final Sustainability Framework to the evidence that you have collected. Determine UTAS’ current level of sustainability based on where it is positioned on your Final Sustainability Framework.
Detail your findings in the Findings section of your report.
If, by now, you feel that your Sustainability Framework is lacking in something, or that it is limited in some way, describe this in a section of your report called Limitations.
In the Recommendations section of your report, you must make recommendations explaining how practices at UTAS could be changed to improve the organization’s level of sustainability. These recommendations must be supported with evidence from the academic and professional literature.
The structure of the report
*REMEMBER: Your word limit is 3000 words. This excludes tables and figures, the Executive Summary, and your reference list. Your report must be uploaded to the dropbox.
Your reprt should follow a report structure that contains the following sections:
Executive SummaryDesigned for busy executives to ‘glance’ at, this short summary details the purpose, main findings and recommendations. It is not necessary to justify the findings or recommendations here. This should be no more than 1-3 paragraphs in length.
Background of the Report 
Imagine that a new employee of the University of Tasmania is reading the report. They need to read this section to learn the history of the report, including:
Who – requested the report (e.g. the University of Tasmania Council) and who generated the report
When – describes when the report was requested, the time period it examined, and when the report was due.
Why – details the purpose of the report and the desired outcome.
This section is brief: up to four paragraphs should be sufficient.
Findings
This section details where UTAS is positioned on your sustainability framework. It also details the evidence you used to make your judgments. You may wish to organise your findings using subheadings, for example, a sub heading for each of the criteria in your framework.
Limitations
If you feel that your framework was lacking something, you may wish to include this section to report the limitations of your findings.
RecommendationsIn this section, you will make recommendations regarding how UTAS can improve its level of sustainability. You must justify each recommendation using evidence from the professional and academic literature. In text references must be included in Harvard style. 
ConclusionImagine that the reader has read all the way through your report. In this section, you want to quickly remind them of the main findings of the report, and a general overview of your recommendations. You are not to include any new ideas in the conclusion. Keep this section brief: one to three paragraphs should suffice.
References
Include the full details of the references you referred to (in text) throughout your report. You must list the references in alphabetical order, using the Harvard referencing style. 
Appendix
This section can contain tables, figures and so forth that help interested parties make more sense of your findings and recommendations. It contains evidence that supports your findings and recommendations – it must not contain any new ideas, findings or recommendations.

What measures did the Japanese government take to propel Japan into a period of affluence? In what way was the year 1964 a turning point? To what extent can the government receive credit for Japan’s high rate of growth in the post-war years? Were international factors also important? Part B: What were the positive effects of affluence in late twentieth century Japan? For whom were these benefits a reality? What were the negative side-effects? Who tended to be left out of the economic advances of the period, and why do you think that was so? reading sets: Japan: A Modern History, by James L. McClain ISBN: 978-0393977202 Page 599-632 Pleases do intext citation thank

What role did women play in the Civil War? Please incorporate Louisa May Alcott’s “Hospital Sketches” and “The Civil War Remembered” where it is possible. In-text citations should be listed as (Alcott, pg, xx). Please write this in essay format. Tips will be given for an answer that incorporates the books listed above and is 2 1/2-3 pages in length

Essay #3: Literary Analysis Through the Lens of…
Background
The purpose of literary criticism is to give readers different ways to read and think about works of literature. In other words, each school of literary criticism is like a pair of glasses with lenses that allow the reader to focus on very specific elements of a text.
Before beginning this essay, read through sections of the Appendix, “Using Literary Criticism in Your Writing,” that cover Formalism and New Criticism, American Multiculturalism, and New Historicism. Alternatively and additionally, you can research these terms to find examples, further definitions, etc.
Essay Assignment
Choose ONE school of criticism that you think would be appropriate to use in order to respond to the following prompt:
Milcha Sanchez-Scott’s The Cuban Swimmer originally opened in 1984 in the midst of a Cuban exodus to Florida. To what extent is The Cuban Swimmer still relevant or irrelevant to a modern day audience?
Based on your chosen literary criticism, you will examine different aspects of the play. As with past essays, be sure the evidence you choose to present is in service of an overall argument. Do not try to take on too much and be sure to focus your ideas.
Essay Requirements

What are two examples of art from the 1930s with explanation of how these artworks embody democratic values; were the works tools of social reform? If so, what were the goals of the artists? Were the works depicting uniquely American scenes? If so, for what purpose?