In our text, the authors discuss what it means to dissent as a citizen, and also dissenting in office.  We all have 1st Amendment rights to speech, among other things.  However, this is a tricky subject when considering these rights and our roles as public employees.  This dropbox is meant to provide us with some general and practical guidelines for these issues.

In the book, you will need to pay close attention to pages 54 – 57.  Also, the case, “A Sign of the Times” will be helpful to read and consider while answering these questions.  

1.  First of all, what are we talking about when we say conscientious “dissent?”

2.  How might conscientious dissent be a bit different from civil disobedience?  (This is important to understand for this question.  I really want us to think about “conscientious dissent” for this question – not so much about “civil disobedience.”  

3.  Under what circumstances might it be OK for a public employee to conscientiously dissent? 

    a.  Even if the public employee dissents in an “acceptable” way, can there still be practical ramifications for the employee?  Explain why.

4.  Under what circumstances is not OK for a public employee to conscientiously dissent?

5.  What options might a public manager have when faced with a choice between legal compliance and a violation of a personal, ethical belief?

Again, I don’t have a minimum word count for this.  This concept and understanding the fine line of these topics is the main thing.  Just answer the questions completely.  I want to be able to clearly see that you understand these concepts.

I need someone to help me with and discussion for me  only 

1. Due Date

   Monday, August 7, 20179:00 AM

   Points Possible

   150

2. Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. 

   Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. 

   Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists  Due Week 5 and worth 150 points  

   Using your thesis statement and research, present the problem that needs to be addressed with your proposed solution. Note: Your solution, advantages, and challenges, will be in Parts 2 and 3.

   Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

   1. Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion). 
   2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (Revised from Assignment 2)
   3. Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
   4. Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
   5. Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.). and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
   6. Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
   7. Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution. 
   8. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
   9. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper.
   10. Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

   Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

   • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
   • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. 

   Note: Submit your assignment to the designated plagiarism program so that you can make revisions before submitting your paper to your professor. 

   The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

   • Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement. 
   • Recognize the use of summary, paraphrasing, and quotation to communicate the main points of a text.
   • Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, logos in writing samples and for incorporation into essays or presentations.
   • Prepare a research project that supports an argument with structure and format appropriate to the genre.
   • Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
   • Incorporate relevant, properly documented sources to substantiate ideas.
   • Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics.  
   • Use technology and information resources to research selected issues for this course. 

Please do the following:

Read Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (attached) and explain the historical role of the “trespass” doctrine in Fourth Amendment considerations (in other words, what did the doctrine allow?) and identify the dissent’s reasoning for believing that wiretapping should be outside of the purview of the Fourth Amendment.What is your opinion as to whether phone conversations should be protected by the Fourth Amendment? Explain

Must be 2-3 paragraphs. Due by Friday, April 21, 2017 @ 6:00pm central standard time, United States. NOT PAYING FOR ANYTHING AFTER 6:00PM CT. If additional sources are used, PLEASE SITE ALL SOURCES. The case is attached as a PDF.

Use two sources from your research ( that express opposing viewpoints on your topic. Write a four-page argument analysis paper in which you analyze the two articles. Explain the issue from both points of view. Summarize the positions taken on the issue in both articles. Describe and evaluate the support, warrants, and backing in both. Identify any fallacies and describe how the authors use rebuttal. Finally, evaluate the ethical or unethical qualities that may appear in these articles and write a conclusion in which you make a claim about the effectiveness of the two articles.

1. Identify all sources within the paper by using parenthetical in-text citations
2. Include an APA-style references page that matches the parenthetical in-text citations.

Topic: IS THERE ANY REATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND GENDER?