150 words no reference-NURSING RESPONSE POST
The ASAs campaign has been completely devoid of evidence but they have gotten away with it because they have utilized the media to their advantage as with this Facebook example. These days people spend a lot of time on social media and tend to obtain a lot of their information that way many getting duped by total nonsense. Unfortunately very few people actually take the time to find real information from legitimate sources. Through out our last discussion we saw that there is in fact sufficient evidence to prove that CRNAs are as safe as anesthesiologists but there continues to be a disconnect between this information and the public. And so I completely agree with that colleagues statement; I believe the CRNA associations need to start writing and circulating the research articles to prove otherwise. While it is important to continue new research endeavors to build more evidence to fight the VAs ruling and other decisions like it I believe at this time it is imperative to focus on effectively disseminating the information already available in ways which will easily reach the lay public. Perhaps utilizing things like videos posted on platforms such as Facebook and YouTube which people commonly use to look for information. These videos could explain what CRNAs do their safety cost-effectiveness while making emphasis on the training necessary to become a CRNA and the difference to a staff RN as well as the fact that CRNAs are equivalent to anesthesiologists. It can also make mention of the research already done to support these claims and post links to the articles for further reading. There could also be videos of interviews done with patients that have been treated by CRNAs and what their experiences were.
There is a lot of work left to be done and we as SRNAs can join the AANA in its mission to advance the science of anesthesia through education and research in many ways. The AANA supports and sometimes funds research conducted by SRNAs. This research can be presented through the State of Science Oral or General Poster Presentations for which they could be $1000 award. The research can also be presented through the AANA NewsBulletin in a designated section to research called Discoveries of Distinction.
Other ways that SRNAs can participate within the AANA can be through the Student Advocate program which was established in 2015. The goal of the program is to have a student acting as a liaison between the AANA and the nurse anesthesia programs. The program is currently attempting to have one student advocate per state but its ultimate goal is to have one student per anesthesia program. Aside from the Student Advocate position the AANA also has a position for a student on the board of trustees. This student keeps the flow of information open between the foundations board of trustees and SRNAs. Students can also showcase their non-anesthesia related talents like singing or playing a musical instrument at fundraising events like that of 2014 The Stars Come out Again. There are also multiple meetings and workshops through out the country SRNAs can be part of like the Nurse Anesthesia Annual Congress taking place in September or The Mid-Year Assembly which will take place in Washington D.C. in April 2018 where nurses go to learn about the healthcare policies impacting nurse anesthesia and develop the skills needed to effectively advocate for your profession during meetings with your federal legislators. This will be a good time to learn how we can be most helpful in affecting change as with the current VA debate.

Posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of two paragraphs. Word totals for each post should be in the 100-200 words range. Whether you agree or disagree explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience. Include a reference, link, or citation when appropriate. APA 6th edition format for references as well as in-text citations is expected.The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services released a comprehensive Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence–2008 Update https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelines-recommendations/tobacco/clinicians/update/index.html The goal of these recommendations is that clinicians strongly recommend the use of effective tobacco dependence counseling and medication treatments to their patients who use tobacco, and that health systems, insurers, and purchasers assist clinicians in making such effective treatments available. After reading these recommendations answer the following questions.
1. what are the clinical interventions for patients unwilling to quit cigarette smoking?2. According to the best practices what are the best strategies to help your clients quit smoking?3. are there any specific smoking cessation recommendations for especial populations such as teenagers or the elderly?

Using proper APA formatting write 400-600 words, not including reference pages discussing the following.

1. What is access control and is it enough to security an entity? (Please provide a detail response)
2. What are the attributes of an efficient access control system?
3. Relating to physical security explain some of the reasons an entity might want to establish restricted areas?
4. Enforcement is a vital component of an efficient access control system; list and describe at least three (3) procedures you would recommend for maintaining the integrity of a card or badge system.

You should have at least 4 different in-text citations and correspondences in reference page. 

Application of the Nursing Process to Deliver Culturally Competent Care.

Select a cultural group you would like to use for your final paper.
Research the literature for an appropriate professional article that discusses the health care needs of your selected cultural group.
It should include 5-7 pages within the body of the paper with 3-5 references (at least two article/book references).
Papers must follow APA format and include title page, abstract, citations and reference pages

1. Narrative is Within Guidelines for Written Presentation (i.e.- Single Spaced, at least 1500 words, Word Count included) (5 points)

1. Grammar, Clarity and Sentence Structure (Narrative has been edited by author and is consistent in tense and person) (10 points)

1. Demonstrated understanding of course concepts and materials (10 points)

1. Introduction (Clearly states the subject, scope of the paper, and the theme)

(5 points)

1. Demonstrated ability to analyze and synthesize course concepts and materials

(15 points)

1. Summary of the Paper (Concise but articulate summary that covers the main points of the paper or the main conclusions) (5 points)

1. Originality of thought and creativity in analysis and problem solution. (15 points)

1. Clarity and effectiveness of data presentation and analysis. (10 points)

1. Overall effectiveness and creativity of the narrative and analysis on the case solution. (25 points)